I.R.S. apologized because the agency
Singled out some Super PACs for extra scrutiny
If their applications for a 501(c)(4)
(That's the tax-free status social-welfare groups are for)
Happened to contain key words like "Patriots" or "Tea",
Thereby compromising donors' anonymity.
(Which still won't result in any taxes being owed)
But, it's not anonymous and - if you want my guess -
Losing that is why they're angry at the I.R.S.
Social-welfare groups are not supposed to organize
With a single candidate; a party in disguise.
In the current atmosphere; bi-partisan mistrust
I.R.S. has questioned if the social welfare's served.
Frankly, I don't think it is... So, why am I unnerved?